<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
         xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">




    



<channel rdf:about="http://www.injurywatch.co.uk/sir-richard-doll/RSS">
  <title>List of all stories regarding Sir Richard Doll</title>
  <link>http://www.injurywatch.co.uk</link>
  
  <description>
    
       Full list of reports relating to Sir Richard Doll
       
  </description>
  
  
  
            <syn:updatePeriod>daily</syn:updatePeriod>
            <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
            <syn:updateBase>2006-12-04T14:58:47Z</syn:updateBase>
        
  
  <image rdf:resource="http://www.injurywatch.co.uk/logo.jpg"/>

  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.injurywatch.co.uk/news-and-groups/news/workplace-illness/exposed-workplace-cancer-naysayer-was-secretly-being-paid-by-drug-companies-231161138"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.injurywatch.co.uk/news-and-groups/news/workplace-illness/top-scientists-turn-out-in-defence-of-sir-richard-doll-8126452"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.injurywatch.co.uk/news-and-groups/news/workplace-illness/big-academic-guns-rolled-out-again-to-protect-richard-doll-s-reputation-91261235"/>
        
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>

</channel>

    <item rdf:about="http://www.injurywatch.co.uk/news-and-groups/news/workplace-illness/exposed-workplace-cancer-naysayer-was-secretly-being-paid-by-drug-companies-231161138">        <title>Injurywatch discovers secret payments for anti-smoking cancer-link Oxford academic Sir Richard Doll by asbestos and chemical industry </title>        <link>http://www.injurywatch.co.uk/news-and-groups/news/workplace-illness/exposed-workplace-cancer-naysayer-was-secretly-being-paid-by-drug-companies-231161138</link>        <description>injurywatch has found a series of secret payments from environmental polluters to the leading Oxford University cancer researcher Sir Richard Doll may have compromised his integrity. By choosing the epidemiological evidence to seemingly omit higher risk groups, adequate health warnings may have failed to have been given. Doll's work certainly seems to have protected the interests of his now proven paymasters in the chemical and asbestos industries and may have led to inadequate protection or warnings for millions of people worldwide. </description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Rory O'Neill and Conrad Murray</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>Sir Richard Doll</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2006-12-11T11:30:55Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Item</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.injurywatch.co.uk/news-and-groups/news/workplace-illness/top-scientists-turn-out-in-defence-of-sir-richard-doll-8126452">        <title>Top scientists turn out in defence of Sir Richard Doll</title>        <link>http://www.injurywatch.co.uk/news-and-groups/news/workplace-illness/top-scientists-turn-out-in-defence-of-sir-richard-doll-8126452</link>        <description>Last night, as was to be expected, top scientists turned out in support of Sir Richard Doll. Open letters were published as follows in The Times:</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>murdom</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>Sir Richard Doll</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2006-12-11T07:21:26Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Item</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.injurywatch.co.uk/news-and-groups/news/workplace-illness/big-academic-guns-rolled-out-again-to-protect-richard-doll-s-reputation-91261235">        <title>Big academic guns roll out (again) to protect Richard Doll's reputation </title>        <link>http://www.injurywatch.co.uk/news-and-groups/news/workplace-illness/big-academic-guns-rolled-out-again-to-protect-richard-doll-s-reputation-91261235</link>        <description>It was no surprise to see the big scientific and academic guns being wheeled out in defence of Sir Richard Doll's reputation. Despite clear and obvious flaws in his studies and massive undeclared payments made to him from interested parties at the time, Sir Richard was always an establishment and industry favourite. Here injurywatch poses the questions his supporters must answer...</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>murdom</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>Sir Richard Doll</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2006-12-11T07:22:42Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Item</dc:type>    </item>




</rdf:RDF>
